Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore(deps): bump scikit-build-core to 0.10 #4365

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

chore(deps): bump scikit-build-core to 0.10 #4365

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Nov 15, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version constraint for the scikit-build-core dependency to allow for newer versions.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the pyproject.toml file by updating the version constraint for the scikit-build-core dependency. The upper bound of the version range is changed from "<0.10" to "<0.11", while maintaining the lower bound of ">=0.5" and excluding version 0.6.0. No other changes to logic, error handling, or control flow are included, and the overall structure of the file remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyproject.toml Updated version constraint for scikit-build-core from "<0.10" to "<0.11" while retaining ">=0.5" and excluding 0.6.0.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@njzjz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ad4289 and cab3c92.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ad4289 and cab3c92.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

5-5: LGTM! Verify compatibility with scikit-build-core 0.10.x

The version constraint update looks good. The change maintains backward compatibility while allowing newer versions up to 0.11.

Let's verify if there are any breaking changes in scikit-build-core 0.10.x that could affect the build:

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from Copilot November 15, 2024 19:37
Copilot
Copilot AI reviewed Nov 15, 2024
View reviewed changes

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.50%. Comparing base (0ad4289) to head (cab3c92).
Report is 1 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4365      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.50%   84.50%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         596      596              
  Lines       56665    56665              
  Branches     3459     3459              
==========================================
- Hits        47884    47883       -1     
  Misses       7654     7654              
- Partials     1127     1128       +1

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚨 Try these New Features:

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm November 15, 2024 20:41
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 908689e Nov 19, 2024
60 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2024
Merged
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

Copilot Copilot left review comments

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@njzjz @wanghan-iapcm